Hmmm...that means the setup.hint file for tetex-20001208-4 is
incomplete. The maintainer needs to add 'libpng2' to the "requires:" line.
--Chuck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just to confirm that with the latest tetex-20001208-4
> and the cygwin texmf-*-* packages I don't need to
> set TEXMFMAIN anymore - although I still have
> TEXINPUTS and the font related variables set to
> "${HOME}/somewhere//:" for my CJK stuff.
>
> Well-done!
>
> BTW - pdftex in tetex-20001208-4 depends on the
> new (10-days-old) libpng 1.0.2 . One needs to
> upgrade that first - or run the
> /etc/postinstall/*{tetex,texmf}*
> scripts again after ungrading libpng. Re-installing
> tetex will not re-run the postinstall script for
> some unknown reason.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 29 January 2002 13:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: New on sourceware: texmf-20000804-2
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>>My Texmf tree came from the stock teTeX 1.0.2
>>
>
> Ok, so you're not using the texmf packages, and not using the latest
> tetex-beta...
>
>
>>Without setting TEXMFMAIN, it looks like latex is trying to look for
>>the texmf tree under //share rather than /usr/share .
>>
>
> Could be.
>
>
>>"TEXMFMAIN = $SELFAUTOPARENT/share/texmf" and my guess is that
>>$SELFAUTOPARENT is not set correctly, but this is the only file
>>
>
> Could also be.
>
>
>>and I can see why the cygwin binaries shouldn't be able to do it
>>correctly...
>>
>
> The latest (experimental) tetex-beta + texmf-base packages should get
> this right. You may be looking at bugs that have been fixed, or you
> may have some other problem. Hard to tell.
>
> Jan.
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
