Robinow, David wrote: > It's in the Graphics category of Cygwin setup. > NTemacs, Xemacs native, and Xemacs cygwin all have their advantages, most > of which I can't remember off the top of my head. The cygwin version will > give you the best interaction with cygwin subprocesses. If you plan to use > emacs as an ide with gnu tools, I'd definitely recommend the cygwin version.
But interaction between cygwin XEmacs and native subprocesses has problems (sun javac is particularly troublesome, I've heard). This is related to the CTRL-C problem that has been around forever -- but nobody cared about it enough to fix it, until now. It looks like Robert Collins is taking some valuable time away from setup.exe to track this down, so this deficiency of cygwin XEmacs may soon be a non-issue. Thanks, Robert. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
