On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 16:55:56 -0700 (PDT) Jeremy Drake wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jul 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > > On Sun, 15 Jun 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > > > > I pushed update to 20.1.7 and synced patches with upstream, current > > > test results: > > > llvm: > > > Total Discovered Tests: 65227 > > > Skipped : 52 (0.08%) > > > Unsupported : 2197 (3.37%) > > > Passed : 62757 (96.21%) > > > Expectedly Failed: 193 (0.30%) > > > Failed : 28 (0.04%) > > > > > > clang: > > > Total Discovered Tests: 46308 > > > Skipped : 8 (0.02%) > > > Unsupported : 181 (0.39%) > > > Passed : 46069 (99.48%) > > > Expectedly Failed: 31 (0.07%) > > > Failed : 19 (0.04%) > > > > > > lld: > > > Total Discovered Tests: 1066 > > > Unsupported: 10 (0.94%) > > > Passed : 1056 (99.06%) > > I went back to the "playground" branch (20.1.8), and backported more > (mostly test) fixes. I removed the clang patch to call the linker > directly there, it was out of date, and probably makes more sense to > continue to develop against 21.1.
The latest clang patch to call the linker directly cannot be applied 20.1.8 cleanly due to some changes in 21.1. > Current test results for 20.1.8: > > llvm: > Total Discovered Tests: 65233 > Skipped : 55 (0.08%) > Unsupported : 2200 (3.37%) > Passed : 62769 (96.22%) > Expectedly Failed: 194 (0.30%) > Failed : 15 (0.02%) > > clang: > Total Discovered Tests: 46308 > Skipped : 8 (0.02%) > Unsupported : 192 (0.41%) > Passed : 46068 (99.48%) > Expectedly Failed: 33 (0.07%) > Failed : 7 (0.02%) Great! Did you mark some tests as 'unsupported' for clang? > Do you think it makes sense to deploy 20.1.8 to master soon and do at > least a test release? Yes I do! Will you do that? -- Takashi Yano <[email protected]>
