On Sun, 4 May 2025 21:44:34 +0100 Jon Turney wrote: > On 23/02/2025 12:33, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to adopt glib2.0 package, because latest pango 1.56.1 > > requires newer glib2.0. > Thanks very much for adopting this package (since it has over 900 > rdepends, it's kind of important!) > > Since glib has an extensive test suite, I humbly suggest you might want > to run it on occasion, to look out for regressions. > > I have somewhere some more extensive notes on the existing failures and > their causes, beyond the cygwin/newlib shortcomings identified in [1], > which I can dig out and share with you, if you like. > > [1] https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-developers/2023-July/012637.html
Thanks for the advice. Currently, the test result is: Ok: 337 Expected Fail: 0 Fail: 24 Unexpected Pass: 0 Skipped: 5 Timeout: 26 Does this seem to regress from that when you checked? -- Takashi Yano <takashi.y...@nifty.ne.jp>
