On 03/04/2025 12:18, Carlo B. wrote:
Hello,
I read some information into this page:
https://cygwin.com/packaging-contributors-guide.html
but I admit that I have not understood very well what I have to do,
starting from "Uploading a package" chapter.
From that point, I'm a bit lost.
Yes, I'm afraid the documentation there is all a bit jumbled up and
could be much better.
So, I'm a bit worried to do some mistakes somewhere and at the moment
I stopped after uploading the precompiled packages at GitHub.
This is the primary reason for not sending an [ITP] or [ITA] message
here, actually.
I'm not sure if you are worried that the packages might not work
properly? Or if you are concerned that you could break something by
uploading a bad package?
I'm always happy to review/discuss any cygport files, if you want to
post them here.
Or if you have suggestions for more efficient ways of working, since you
have a large number of packages, I'd like to hear them.
I have to say that many of my .cygport scripts don't prove a
BUILD_REQUIRES statement.
So, some work will be also required first for some of them.
Understood.
If you send an ssh public key, I can give you access to our
"buildservice" playground, which may be helpful in verifying that your
cygport is good and you have identified all the build requirements.