On 25/01/2025 03:31, Daisuke Fujimura via Cygwin-apps wrote:
I have decided that it is the mainstream practice in cygwin packages
to include information such as licenses in the runtime package, and I
have followed this practice.
However, I also believe that there is a possibility that these files
may conflict if the so version is incremented.
Example:
- https://cygwin.com/packages/x86_64/libchromaprint0/libchromaprint0-1.2-1
- https://cygwin.com/packages/x86_64/libchromaprint1/libchromaprint1-1.4.3-1
Yeah, this is correct. Well spotted.
I think this practice is used by some linux distros (Debian?), so it
would be interesting to look at how they handle this issue.
