On 2024-11-20 12:43, Glenn Strauss via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:27:19PM -0700, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Hi folks,

Arch is clarifying packages PKGBUILD sources licences.

https://archlinux.org/news/providing-a-license-for-package-sources/

https://rfc.archlinux.page/0040-license-package-sources/

What are our assumptions and requirements?

I co-maintain a number of packages with Eric Blake which has his Copyright
and a licence text matching the FSF Unlimited License (with License
Retention) with his name or the word "I" substituted for "FSF" (EB/ULLR?):

        https://spdx.org/licenses/FSFULLR.html

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FSF_Unlimited_License#License_Retention_Variant

I, too, was initially confused by the email I received from Arch.

By my reading, the license text that Arch is planning to use is
specifically for files that do not already specify a license.
     "Any files containing a license notice are excluded from this license."

The full license text that Arch is planning to use is below.
Cheers, Glenn

        https://rfc.archlinux.page/0040-license-package-sources/

License Text

     Binary files, as well as any files describing changes ("patches") to the 
software that is being built are excluded from this license. They are provided under the 
license terms of the software they describe changes for.

     Any files containing a license notice are excluded from this license. They 
are provided under the license terms defined in their respective notices.

     Copyright 2024 Arch Linux Contributors

     Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any 
purpose with or without fee is hereby granted.

     THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED “AS IS” AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES 
WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF 
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY 
SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER 
RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, 
NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE 
USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.

I have provided a BSD-2-clause contributor's licence for patches, and others previously provided a Cygwin Copyright Assignment:

        https://cygwin.com/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=blob;f=winsup/CONTRIBUTORS

do we need something similar for packages, plus a default assumption?

--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis              Calgary, Alberta, Canada

La perfection est atteinte                   Perfection is achieved
non pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à ajouter  not when there is no more to add
mais lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à retirer     but when there is no more to cut
                                -- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

Reply via email to