On 14/01/2024 14:57, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 15:48:33 +0000
Jon Turney wrote:
On 04/01/2024 00:55, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
[...]
# The entire code is under MIT
# include/utlist.h which is under BSD-1-Clause (unbundled)
# lib/kernel/vecmath which is under GPL-3.0-or-later OR LGPL-3.0-or-later
LICENSE="MIT, BSD-1-Clause, GPL-3.0-or-later OR LGPL-3.0-or-later"
I think this is going to fail to validate as an SPDX license expression.
The identifiers should be combined with AND and OR (where OR represents
a choice, and AND represents compliance with both alternatives is required).
What about "MIT AND BSD-1-Clause AND (GPL-3.0-or-later OR LGPL-3.0-or-later)"?
Is "()" allowed?
Yes.
https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2-draft/SPDX-license-expressions/#d45-order-of-precedence-and-parentheses
When I try to build it fails:
[449/761] Linking CXX shared module lib/llvmopencl/cygllvmopencl.dll
FAILED: lib/llvmopencl/cygllvmopencl.dll
[...]
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpocl: No such file or directory
clang-8: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
invocation)
I don't know if that means it's looking for the installed rather than
just built libpocl there, or something else is wrong.
I cannot reproduce this even if I uninstall libpocl-devel. Umm, what
is the difference?
Yeah, confusing. I think it might have been caused by not having
libOpenCL-devel installed.
Anyhow, I can build it OK now, so all is good.
Maybe consider adding BUILD_REQUIRES="clang libllvm-devel libhwloc-devel
libOpenCL-devel ninja" or whatever is correct :)
