On 21.11.2023 07:58, ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps writes:
After applying the attached patches, which add support for the newer
gpg2 from gnupg2 if installed, the attached log second chunk shows the
new keys verified by gpg2 added to lib/src_prep.cygpart
___gpg_verify().
Similar code has been added to lib/pkg_pkg.cygpart __pkg_srcpkg() for
check and definition and __gpg_sign() for use in gpg signing of Cygwin
patches and files.
We should just switch to gpg2 an require that, there is no point in
trying to use GPG 1.x anymore.
https://repo.or.cz/cygport/rpm-style.git/commitdiff/84279e484726a68cc8f08e7c9126bef13d9510d7
Regards,
Achim.
should I just retire gpg 1.x and stop having gpg2 as different binary name ?
$ for i in /usr/bin/gpg* ; do echo -n $i " : " ; cygcheck -f $i ; done
/usr/bin/gpg.exe : gnupg-1.4.23-1
/usr/bin/gpg2.exe : gnupg2-2.2.35-2
/usr/bin/gpg-agent.exe : gnupg2-2.2.35-2
/usr/bin/gpgconf.exe : gnupg2-2.2.35-2
/usr/bin/gpg-connect-agent.exe : gnupg2-2.2.35-2
/usr/bin/gpg-error.exe : libgpg-error-devel-1.47-1
/usr/bin/gpgme-config : libgpgme-devel-1.9.0-1
/usr/bin/gpgme-tool.exe : libgpgme-devel-1.9.0-1
/usr/bin/gpgparsemail.exe : gnupg2-2.2.35-2
/usr/bin/gpgrt-config : libgpg-error-devel-1.47-1
/usr/bin/gpgscm.exe : gnupg2-2.2.35-2
/usr/bin/gpgsm.exe : gnupg2-2.2.35-2
/usr/bin/gpgsplit.exe : gnupg-1.4.23-1
gnupg2-2.2.35-2
/usr/bin/gpgtar.exe : gnupg2-2.2.35-2
/usr/bin/gpgv.exe : gnupg-1.4.23-1
/usr/bin/gpgv2.exe : gnupg2-2.2.35-2
/usr/bin/gpg-wks-server.exe : gnupg2-2.2.35-2
/usr/bin/gpg-zip : gnupg-1.4.23-1
