Thank you for your advice. I wasn't sure if there was any problem mixing noarch and x86_64 in the same package, but from this description it seems safe.
I plan to deploy with `ARCH=noarch`. - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/5431600438 On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:09 PM Jon Turney <jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk> wrote: > > On 27/06/2023 08:32, Daisuke Fujimura via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > Hello, > > > > ==== > > > > Cygportfile: > > - https://cygwin.com/cgit/cygwin-packages/playground/tree/?h=ruby-atk > > > > Packages, logs: > > - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/5383991799 > > > # we have to wait until the old archful ones are archived > > #ARCH=noarch > > I'm not sure what this comment means. > > I think all the historical limitations around changing between arch and > archful have been removed [1], so if this package is now noarch, please > mark it as such. > > Otherwise, looks good. I added this to your packages. > > Thanks. > > [1] https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/2019-June/039614.html
