> If you can locally build a working package, you can use 'cygport upload' > to upload it (and then push the update to the packaging repo with > '--push-option=nobuild').
Thanks for the advice! I have confirmed that ruby-tk can be packaged by updating cygport and ruby-rdoc. - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4889008372 - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4889008372/jobs/8727225513#step:6:223 (Bin dir is correct) - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4889008372/jobs/8727225513#step:6:1722 (ERROR not found) On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:22 AM Jon Turney <jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk> wrote: > > On 02/05/2023 10:31, Daisuke Fujimura via Cygwin-apps wrote: > >> Is this error expected? > > > > Sorry, I missed that. > > > > This seems to be caused by rdoc-6.1.2 not working with ruby-3.x. > > > > - > > https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2019/12/12/separation-of-positional-and-keyword-arguments-in-ruby-3-0/ > > > > Therefore, it is necessary to update rdoc first, but packaging > > rdoc-6.5.0 also fails for the same reason, so it needs to be updated > > by other means besides scallywag: > > If you can locally build a working package, you can use 'cygport upload' > to upload it (and then push the update to the packaging repo with > '--push-option=nobuild'). > > > - Create a package using ruby-2.6.4. > > - Create a package using rdoc-6.5.0 installed in a different location > > with gem install. > > > > Other issues have also been found. > > > > - > > https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4850129175/jobs/8642826755#step:6:223 > > > > This seems to need a fix in rubygems.cygclass, so I will send a patch. > > > > I will work in the following order. > > > > 1. Send a patch for rubygems.cygclass > > 2. ITA ruby-rdoc > > 3. ITA ruby-tk > > Thanks very much. >
