On 2023-01-13 07:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 13:22:44 +0000
Jon Turney wrote:
On 13/01/2023 11:52, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Hi,
Is it allowed to include '-' in version string (e.g. '20230113-stable')?
I'm asking because mksetupini warns:
mksetupini: file 'xxx.tar.xz' in package yyy contains '-' in version
though it works as expected.
Short answer:
It's a bug that this isn't a fatal error. Please don't do it!
Long answer:
Package naming in Cygwin has a long and tangled history. This isn't
explicitly precluded by the rules at [1], but probably should be.
(Fedora, which we generally follow for packaging rules, now doesn't
allow '-' in versions, just digits, letters and '.')
We need to be able to unambiguously separate a NVR string into the
package name, version and release.
Underscores are allowed in package names, so the simple approach of
splitting on the rightmost two hyphens would work, if we don't allow
exceptions like this.
(We can get it right in this case, because we have a piece of extra
information: the directory the package is in, which happens to always be
named N in the current scheme of things, but we might want to change that)
[1] https://cygwin.com/packaging-package-files.html
In any case, you should be suspicious of using upstream version names of
this form. They may expect the 'stable' string to sort against other
strings based on meaning, rather than alphabetically (e.g.
'20230113-testing' is considered greater, which is probably not what's
wanted)
Thanks for the answer.
I'll use version 20230113 with release 1.g<git hash tag>
e.g. package-name-20230113-1.g123456789abc like
cygwin test package.
We typically use *stable* commit dates of unambiguous commits or incremental
versions rather than hashes even when packages are pulled from repos which do
not provide releases e.g. ca-certificates, libhsts, publicsuffix-list.
We also have packages where the versions have been frozen for historical reasons
and new versions have release numbers like 1.yyyymmdd, 2.YYYYMMDD, etc.
Status like stable is assumed of current releases, as test releases can be
promoted to current stable release using 'untest'.
Other suffixes normally use release 0 and imply never being promoted to current
from pre-release candidates, like Cygwin snapshots and interim test releases.
You can keep the hash info around in your build or cygport but it does not help
users, as you are already using a date version and a release, so you might as
well drop it from the package.
We can handle numbering issues using cygport SRC_URI, SRC_DIR,
CYGPORT_USE_UNSTABLE_API source hooks, and src_... script overrides.
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta, Canada
La perfection est atteinte Perfection is achieved
non pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à ajouter not when there is no more to add
mais lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à retirer but when there is no more to cut
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry