On 30/01/2021 09:04, Achim Gratz wrote:

The following distributions will no longer be available after the
perl-5.32 release as they have been deprecated upstream:

perl-Gnome2                                  Achim Gratz
perl-Gnome2-Canvas                           Achim Gratz
perl-Gnome2-GConf                            Achim Gratz
perl-Gnome2-Rsvg                             Achim Gratz
perl-Gnome2-VFS                              Achim Gratz
perl-Gnome2-Vte                              Achim Gratz
perl-Gnome2-Wnck                             Achim Gratz
perl-Gtk2                                    Achim Gratz
perl-Gtk2-GladeXML                           Achim Gratz
perl-Gtk2-Notify                             Achim Gratz
perl-Gtk2-SourceView2                        Achim Gratz
perl-Gtk2-Spell                              Achim Gratz
perl-Gtk2-Unique                             Achim Gratz
perl-Gtk2-WebKit                             Achim Gratz

There are no external dependencies to these, so please just mark them as
OBSOLETE.

I've vaulted all versions of these packages. Sorry for taking so long to get around to this.


At the moment, 'OBSOLETE' in cygwin-pkg-maint has a very specific meaning: the line is simply ignored by calm.

If you just mark a package as OBSOLETE without any other action, calm's going to warn about an unexpected package in the relarea.

That works in the case when a package has been replaced by something else, and the historically necessary rearrangement to make the obsoleted package a sub-package of the package which replaces it has happened. (we didn't just remove the obsolete package because historically the obsoletion was recorded in the obsoleted package's metadata).

(There's a whole other set of considerations for packages with the category '_obsolete', but again I think those are historical artefacts)


I'm not sure what the word is for the status of these packages (but they are all deprecated upstream, don't have a direct replacement, probably aren't of any use to anybody, so clearly keeping them around any longer is pointless...)

Reply via email to