On Mon, 23 May 2022 19:37:43 +0100, Jon Turney > On 23/05/2022 14:09, Lemures Lemniscati wrote: > > On Sat, 21 May 2022 21:31:46 +0100, Jon Turney > >> Eventually, this should eliminate packages in the deprecated so report [1] > >> with a rdepends count of zero. To reduce the rdpepends count to zero, > >> packages which depend on a deprecated soversion need to be rebuilt for a > >> newer soversion. > >> > >> [1] https://cygwin.com/packages/reports/deprecated_so.html > > > > Although libiconv2 is contained in the list above, > > I don't think it is deprecated. > > Haha. I think this is just a bug, and the code which generates that report > is getting confused by the test: status of libiconv2. > > Thanks for pointing that out. I'll look into fixing it when I can.
All right. And yet another small point... I've uploaded libiconv 1.17-1 tagged with 'test', but their statuses are 'stable' in the page of its src package: https://www.cygwin.com/packages/summary/libiconv-src.html , while the ones of generated libiconv packages are 'test': e.g. https://www.cygwin.com/packages/summary/libiconv-devel.html . I was confused a bit by the situation :). Lem
