[ISP being sold outsourced miltering to idiots who drop messages, so pasting from archives!]

On Wed May 4 11:25:44 GMT 2022, Jon Turney wrote:
On 2022-05-04 01:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On May  2 23:15, Brian Inglis wrote:
Eric Blake no longer seems to have free time available for Cygwin
package upgrades, so I would like to offer to co-maintain
coreutils and provide upgrades as they are now five years old.

Done. Thanks.

I would like to provide an upgrade to the final version 8 release
8.32, initially as a TEST release, before working on the latest
release 9.1.
Package sources and archives are available online at:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1z_giKv3QIUbYvSNOiTtMMr644v-wOG_k
and builds in playground from:
https://cygwin.com/git-cygwin-packages/?p=git/cygwin-packages/playground.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/playground

Since it didn't already exist, I've created git://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/coreutils.git using a new tool
I've been working on ('ctm2git') which synthesizes a git history of
the packaging for a package from the source package history in the
CTM.
If that's not wanted, please let me know and I'll remove it.

That's really nice, thanks, I'll drop my two version playground.

https://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/jobs.cgi?srcpkg=playground&status=&user=Brian+Inglis&id=4119
https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/2239985902
The jobs appear to fail because some checks fail and return non-zero status.
Comparing checks between current and proposed releases and across
x86/_64/CI jobs, there appear to be fewer failures despite more
tests.
All feedback is encouraged and gratefully received.

Thanks for picking up coreutils, which is not only by name a core
package.
I think this is at least worthy of a pink hippo ;)

Thanks, hopefully I can be worthy of *IT*!

--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]

Reply via email to