On Jan 16 17:55, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote: > This reminds me: It's probably useful for me to support 32-bit even after > Cygwin no longer does for my commercial project(s). Which probably means I > should release said package soon (I couldn't get the rebase to work on > 32-bit before, will ask another question soon. Are all the 32-bit packages > going offline after support ends or will it remain as a kind of graveyard?
This hasn't been decided yet. I *guess* we keep the 32 bit packages around for a while. Corinna
