On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 07:59:14 +0100, Achim Gratz > Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps writes: > > Does it mean that we should have a way to rebase such dynamic objects > > automatically? > > Well, the first step is to make sure that packaged and locally installed > stuff stays separate (for Perl this is the distinction between vendor > and site distributions) and set up a sensible precedence order. Next is > that users might not have admin rights, so there's a separation between > local system and local user to consider (Perl: local::lib). Once you > have that sorted then yes, you need to think about when and how to do > the rebase of any dynamic objects you are going to produce. For Perl I > managed to insert an automatic ephemeral rebase, but only for i686 and > packages built with ExtUtils::MakeMaker (so that build tests can > actually work without having to do an extra step). The local > installations should be taken care of via the autorebase facilities, > although that requires cooperation from the system admin for user > installations. >
Thank you for comments and advices. I'll try it. Regards, Lem
