Stefan Köpsell writes: > The only answer I have is, that I do not plan to ITPing something > which uses Mini-XML -- because it seems that not so many other > software packages are actually depend on it. And the ones I found in > Debian do not attract me. But the reason I like to have the library > in Cygwin is, that several of our projects depend on the library - and > it makes contributing more easy, if the library is available as Cygwin > package.
If that's the only reason, you might want to provide your own repository that you then use together with the main Cygwin one. > But I understand that this argument might not be very convincing. That isn't the only factor in the decision, but since we already have a bunch of XML libraries I'd personally ask what's wrong with those that the new package does better. It appears that the package is in EPEL/CentOS7 and openSUSE, so that would tip the scales somewhat in favor of including it in Cygwin as well. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada
