On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 01:22:04PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: > On 5/15/2017 12:51 PM, szgyg wrote: >> I've used the attached files to create an empty, dependencies-only package. > > Yes, that works around the problem by not actually creating an empty binary > tarball. But I still think cygport should allow the creation of an empty > binary tarball by a set but empty PKG_CONTENTS.
Yeah, it creates a tarball with an empty usr/ directory. What I would really like is a cygclass for empty packages. szgyg
