On Apr 9 18:49, Jon Turney wrote: > > Following on from the discussion up to [1] > > Below is a list of packages that: > 1/all install packages are empty > 2/have no dependencies > 3/aren't obsoletion packages > > The majority of these are annotated 'empty', 'source only' or similar, but > as pointed out, it's somewhat confusing to show these in setup's package > list, as installing the binary package does nothing. > > I've made a change to calm so packages satisfying these conditions don't > appear in setup.ini, so they won't be offered for installation by setup. > > These sources are still installable by asking setup to install the source of > any of the subpackages (e.g. the corresponding runtime library or devel > package)
Good idea! Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
