On Jun 21 08:08, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/21/2016 06:03 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >> * 'curr', 'prev' and 'test' don't make sense on a per-version basis. So I > >> suggest a separate file for these version overrides (versions.hint?) > > > > Ideally we wouldn't need something like "prev" at all since the version > > number itself is sufficient to specify what's curr and what's old. > > Except when upstream version numbers go backwards. We'd have to adopt > something like Fedora's "epoch" numbering if we want our version numbers > to always be increasing (by bumping the epoch any time upstream versions > go backwards).
I think Yaakov is desperately asking for this for a long time :) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
