On May 13 15:33, Jon Turney wrote: > > Recently I've done a little prototyping of a system to build from uploaded > source packages in a VM, to verify that they recreate packages with the same > contents as the uploaded packages. > > Issues I noted were: > [...] > * a handful of packages are oddities > > These often contain source and patches, but no build script, so the > configuration used by the maintainer to build the package isn't recorded (at > least in a way accessible to automation) > > pkg ver arch > --- --- ---- > bzr 2.6+b2-2 x86 contains source for 2.6b2-1 and 2.6+b2-2 > exim 4.86-1 both > fetchmail 6.3.21-1 x86 > flex 2.5.39-1 both orphaned > ipc-utils 1.0-1 x86
The orignal x86 package predates me using cygport. The x86_64 package has then probably been built by Yaakov, who's much less a slacker than I am. Just rebuilding the 32 bit packafge with Yaakov's 64 bit cygport file will probably do. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
