Warren Young writes: > Isn’t the whole point of this discussion that setup.exe already knows > all the tricks it needs to in order to do what we want here, except > for the “replace setup.exe in place” issue I’ve brought up separately?
Well, setup.exe today has a lot of probably bitrotted features that Cygwin never used (even if some of it looks quite interesting and useful) and there are other things it doesn't do even though it should probably be doing it. > Why do you need a self-contained POSIX environment to replace > setup.exe? At the moment I'm just thinking whether that might be a more sustainable way forward. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra
