On 2015-07-18 21:46, Marco Atzeri wrote: | | | On 7/18/2015 10:11 AM, jari wrote: | >On 2015-07-17 20:17, Achim Gratz wrote: | >| jari writes: | >| > All good, provided that: | >| > | >| > xdelta1 => /usr/bin/xdelta (the original) | >| > xdelta3 => /usr/bin/xdelta3 | >| | >| Why? The most current version of pristine-tar from git includes a commit | >| that gets rid of the hardcoded command names. | > | >Could you point me to it. Joey's attic Git? | > | >| Given that it's pristine-tar that holds onto an earlier version of | >| xdelta, I don't see why other users of xdelta expecting to get the | >| latest version should be suffering from that. | > | >The official setup in Debian: | > | > xdelta: /usr/bin/xdelta (version 1.1.3) | > xdelta3: /usr/bin/xdelta3 | > | >I think we should ensure compatibility between operating systems by | >having similar setup. | > | >Jari | > | | as today | $ cygcheck -cd |grep xdelta | xdelta 3.0.9-1 | | To avoid backwards, my proposal is | | xdelta1-1.1.4-2 | xdelta-3.0.9-2 (removing the xdelta link to xdelta3) | | if we agree that going backward in not a problem, | | xdelta-1.1.4-2 | xdelta3-3.0.9-2
The latter. It would be in par with Linux packages. Jari
