On Jun  7 22:21, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
> > I'll have to write a ChangeLog and clean up the code a bit before I'll
> > post the patches.
> 
> Here's the patch for setup:

I'm still not quite sure what problem this solves.  Is it faster than
plain SHA512 checksums?  Just the reduction from 128 to 86 chars doesn't
look like it's really worth the changes required in setup and upset.
What's the actual gain?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

Attachment: pgp2L1mdWe7TG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to