On May 29 21:37, Achim Gratz wrote: > > The new SHA512 checksums are rather lengthy. Could we switch them to > Base64 (perhaps the URL and file safe variant) instead of the current > hex encoding instead (maybe with an SHA512: prefix if we want to support > both)?
Not for the time being. Sombody would have to add code to setup as well as upset to make this work. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpExMqEOrneL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
