On 2/19/2015 2:46 PM, Reini Urban wrote:
And the deal with the latest clisp 2.49 was that modules can be dynaloaded. If the gnulib steps would work. I never did for me. And I fixed most of the other module compilation problems before.
But I just discovered that clisp-2.49 builds fine with the configure option --without-dynamic-modules. Is there any reason not to do that? After all, clisp-2.48 is built without dynamic modules, so what's the harm in doing the same for 2.49?
Ken