On 1/30/2015 2:02 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 11:40 -0500, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 8:25 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
I'm attaching the patches that I applied (on top of Reini's patches) in
order to make the build succeed. I also had to use libdb4.5 instead of
libdb4.8.
Is that ok? I mean, shouldn't a package always try to use the latest
version? What's the problem you're observing ? Maybe Volker can help
here?
The clisp-2.48 code uses some macros and structures that are defined in the
db4.5 headers but have changed or disappeared in db4.8. I'll see if I can
figure out how to update the code for db4.8.
OK, that wasn't so hard. I'm attaching the patch that I applied, in case Reini
or Volker has a chance to look at it. All 76 tests for the berkeley-db module
passed.
FYI, this is the patch Fedora uses for this issue:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/clisp.git/plain/clisp-db.patch
That patch doesn't deal with the differences between db4.5 and db4.8 (e.g.,
DB_XIDDATASIZE was changed to DB_GID_SIZE, among other things). It must be for
a different issue.
Ken
