Hi Daniel, On Aug 17 21:22, D. Boland wrote: > Hi group, > > Thanks for all the critiques and suggestions regarding this new > library. I have made changes accordingly. > > * The term 'capabilities' has been removed from the hints file, since > that is not what the library is about or for. > > * Also the term 'multi-root' has been removed from the hints file. I > think the new description in the hints file now accurately covers what > the library does. > > * Not all functions in the library were declared. They are now. > > * I added a readme file. > > * I removed the dynamic library. This library will be static only. > > * I put the license under the 'Open Source Definition' license and > added a reference to the complete license text.
Uh, that's a bit of a problem. The text under http://opensource.org/docs/osd/ does *not* constitute a license by itself. It just describes what a license has to define to become an OSS license. For blessed OSS licenses, see http://opensource.org/licenses/. For a simple lib like this I'd suggest http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause or http://opensource.org/licenses/LGPL-3.0 > http://cygwin.boland.nl/x86/release/libsuexec/ A LICENSE file parallel to usr/share/doc/README containing the license text would be nice. Other than that licensing issue, the package is GTG. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgp7mHTQaZvPn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
