On 6/18/2013 19:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Whom are you asking? Not me, I hope. If so, whatever you guys think is > right, is right, as long as gcc just works and the Cygwin DLL builds. > As a sidepoint, you won't get as much testing as you like as long as the > stuff is in "test". Most people don't install test versions anyway. >
If 4.7.3 is to be considered stable, I need all the cooperation from all the gcc deps maintainers, clearly gcc-4.7.2 experimental is stable enough since I am able to build 4.7.3 with it. All the new ppl/mpc/mpfr/gmp that were marked experimental needs to be switched to stable at the same time gcc-4.7.x or else gcc would be broken for awhile without those DLLs.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature