On May 23 11:24, marco atzeri wrote: > Il 5/23/2013 10:44 AM, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > >Hi guys, > > > > > > > > But what about cygserver? Without cygserver there's no XSI IPC. > > Even if we don't change the service names on a general basis, > > shouldn't cygserver at least be available in parallel, using > > different service names? > > my experience with postgreSQL says that the two services are not > interchangeable. > 32 bit program fails with 64 cygserver
Yes, of course, because cygserver is bound to the installation path *and* there are no provisions in cygserver to handle processes of different architecture. Therefore my question... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
