On 4/23/2013 10:37 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I still think it would make sense to name the packages according to their architecture in future: foo-1.0-1.i686.tar.bz2 bar-2.3-4.x86_64.tar.bz baz-5.0-8.noarch.tar.bz2
no objection
We should also find a simply mechanism to share the noarch packages between the i686 and x86_64 release area, either by adding a noarch dir or by automatic copying or linking the files (or parent dirs) between the i686 and x86_64 release areas.
this will require syncronization between the two versions and it is unlikely to happen anytime soon
Corinna
Marco
