On Aug 20 20:15, JonY wrote: > On 8/14/2012 16:02, Kai Tietz wrote: > > 2012/8/14 Corinna Vinschen: > >> On Aug 14 08:46, Andy Koppe wrote: > >>> Yep, mintty builds fine with that, and appears to work. For some > >>> reason it's 9K bigger than with the current w32api though. > >> > >> I think this is because the mingw-w64 libs come with a couple more > >> static elements built into the libs (GUIDs and stuff). > >> > >> Kai, can you explain the difference? > >> > >> > >> Corinna > > > > Well, major difference here is - as you already mentioned - the fact > > that mingw-w64 provides some helper-routines (as described by msdn) in > > ws2_32 and some other libraries. Also the uuid-library is a bit > > bigger. Also we provide some of the intrinsic-function as > > inline-code, which might be responsible for some size-improvment - but > > better optimization - you notice. Btw have you checked size with > > debugging-information, or without? > > > > Regards, > > Kai > > > > > New version up. Was the first uploaded? > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api/w32api-3.0b_svn5373-1-src.tar.bz2/download > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api/w32api-3.0b_svn5373-1.tar.bz2/download > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api/setup.hint/download
None have been uploaded so far. I'm not sure of the current state of the discussion. Are the above w32api headers good to go or is a new version in the loop? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
