About varnish cache application, the packages are GTG for David. Please somebody upload the three packages (Prev, Curr and Test) to cygwin servers. The package URL that I send in my previous email were:
wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-2.1.2-5-src.tar.bz2 wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-2.1.2-5.tar.bz2 wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-2.1.4-5-src.tar.bz2 wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-2.1.4-5.tar.bz2 wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-r5665-5-src.tar.bz2 wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-r5665-5.tar.bz2 wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/setup.hint By the way, if somebody has a web server in a cygwin enviroment and want to try "varnish cache", feel free to send me an email. 2011/1/11 David Sastre: > 2011/1/11, jdzstz - gmail dot com : >> 2011/1/11 David Sastre : >>> 2011/1/11, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:23:45AM +0100, David Sastre wrote: >>>>>On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 07:57:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:34:03PM +0100, David Sastre wrote: >>>>>> >OK. Please bump the cygwin package release number when you do that. >>>>>> Why bump the package release on something that has never been released? >>>>>> I think it makes sense that the first release should be -1. >>>>> >>>>>That's what I understand from: >>>>> >>>>>2.?Do increase the version number no matter what (if upstream >>>>>version didn't change, bump the Cygwin release number): even if the >>>>>package was bad, even if it was removed from the server for >>>>>a security issue, even if has only been discussed in mailing >>>>>list and never uploaded: it costs nothing and avoids confusion >>>>>in both setup.exe and people mind. >>>> >>>> The package was never on the server, i.e., it was never released. If >>>> a package ever touches cygwin.com then, yes, you have to bump the >>>> version any time you make any change no matter how tiny. >>>> >>>> I don't care if the package is released with -57 release number but I >>>> don't want it to get into the common knowledge pool that it is a >>>> requirement because it isn't. >>> >>> Duly noted. Thanks for the clarification. >>> >> Do you want to renumber the packages to varnish-xxx-1 or I keep >> actual name "varnish-xxx-5"?? >> >> The only problem with rename is that old messages in cygwin-apps >> mailist can confuse in the future. > > Let's keep it. Thanks. >
