On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Charles Wilson <cyg...@cwilson.fastmail.fm> wrote: > Hmm. So, big picture, we have possibly three different mingw-ish compilers, > and you're currently attempting to shepherd the first one, while being > mindful of future issues related to simultaneous installation of both of the > first two: > > (1) mingw64-derived, multilib, default 64bit > (2) mingw64-derived, multilib, default 32bit > (3) mingw.org-derived, non-multilib, only 32bit
Is there any reason why there wouldn't be non-multilib versions of our stuff? How many permutations do you want to have?
