On Jun 20 22:35, Yaakov S wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 13:39 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > pine is the only package still using the really crufty openssl-0.9.7. > > Since Igor Peshansky is AWOL for quite some time now, I'd like to remove > > the pine and openssl097 packages from the distro. ASAP. Does anybody > > have a problem with that? If so, would you take over maintainership > > for pine? > > We have a problem: several libsasl2 modules are also linked against > 0.9.7, and as several packages use libsasl2, we need this ITA'd ASAP. > We had better check the rest of the distro to make sure that current > openssl deps are actually 0.9.8. > > To avoid these problems in the future (and openssl 1.0.0 is coming soon, > I presume, so this will be an issue fairly soon), may I suggest the > current DLLs from openssl be packaged separately as libssl0.9.8?
That was the plan anyway as soon as I get around to move to openssl-1.0.0 myself. I assume you mean "asap"? Including to change the package dependencies throughout? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
