On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 14:00 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Which is 10 days ago, unfortunately. Can nobody help him to fix this > problem?
Besides that it was already *after* the due date. But it's hard to fix a problem that you can't reproduce. > NMU? http://wiki.debian.org/NonMaintainerUpload > Jari is responsive, even though not quite as responsive as I'd expect > from a package maintainer, especially on the base cygwin mailing list. BTW I have a request pending[1] for a xmlto update needed for some X.Org documentation. But the Python upgrade is much more important. > I don't think it's a good idea to define a package as orphaned as long > as the maintainer replies to mail and still uploads new packages. That > sets a bad precedent. What about working with Jari to fix the issue > instead, and what about you, Jari, to be somewhat more responsive? Did > you try to debug this issue? Is there maybe just some DLL missing or > the permissions of the DLL are wrong? I just hope this doesn't take too much longer... Yaakov [1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-05/msg00146.html
