On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 06:23:15PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: >On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>I will try and stay attentive to the lists during this period; I am >>aware that I have a few outstanding emails to reply to, e.g. Marco A: >>I'm preparing a new release of gcc-4 with all DLLs for all the >>runtimes, and that will be available fairly soon, but I have a problem >>with typeinfo vs. libstdc++ DLL that I am currently working on a patch >>for ld before it can function correctly. > >Someone spent their SoC doing major MingW improvements on the compiler, >including better handling of dwarf and pe weak symbols. It might be >worthwhile to see what can be ported over to Cygwin. It sure would be >nice to have pe weak symbols support in the cygwin loader...
I could be wrong but I doubt that Dave intended his heads up to be the start of a new gcc wishlist discussion. However, it would be pretty unusual for something like weak symbols to be supported only on MinGW and not in Cygwin. MinGW and Cygwin share the same code base for both binutils and gcc. cgf
