-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Charles Wilson wrote: > So...should cygwin-1.7 packages all be built using gcc-4.x, or not? (And > is it really, as I fear, an all-or-nothing proposition given the libgcc > changes?)
I'm not sure how much this is all-or-nothing for C, but I imagine that it would be for C++. But I very seriously think that everything should be rebuilt with cygwin-1.7 and gcc-4.3, as this is the best time to make that transition (as well as give both a through testing before stabilizing). Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkkGeKQACgkQpiWmPGlmQSOxDgCffuHEKcj+Cvl+r8i8f79ikqpE F9QAoL1qX9Qa5wuF3n7Nq2TJ1VSOUOOQ =CXoy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
