On Apr 15 13:59, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 05:44:00PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Red Hat *is* the owner of the code, regardless of the registry key you > >want to use. I know that you have mixed feelings about Red Hat, > >however, assuming the code is owned by the FSF, would you object > >against a parent key name of FSF as well? > > Ok, since my motives for having an opinion are in question, I will > withdraw from the discussion, rather than spending time on > pointless self-justification.
I apologize for making this argument. It was needless, pointless and rude. Since everybody else seems to dislike the company name in the registry key, I will not further argue against using "Cygwin Project\Cygwin" or just "Cygwin". Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
