On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:25:20PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote: >Lapo Luchini wrote: >> It does indeed need libiconv and libintl, but it currently links them >> statically. >> I'll investigate that a bit further and either convince it to use the >> shared ones or correct the setup.hint. >> >OK, I failed to convince it so far. >Given the fact that 5-25 August I will be between sand and sun with a >dozen of friends (and my internet access will be sporadic)... should we >release the currently packaged and working but statically linked >pinfo-0.6.9-1 and then do a iconv-intl-shared-using pinfo-0.6.9-2 with >more time when I return, or do you think it is so important to use the >shared libs right now? > >Your call... both do perfectly fine for me.
I'd say this is actually your call. If you are ok with linking them statically, I see no reason why you shouldn't do so. cgf
