On Jul 25 01:42, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Never mind, I just found them. The directory layout is a bit weird > > now: > > > > - exif > > - libexif > > - libexif12 > > - libexif-devel > > - libexif10 > > Yeah, I know, that's how Gerrit set them up; should I move libexif > immediately under release?
No worries, it's your call. > > Why are libexif12 and libexif-devel not in the same directory level > > as libexif10? Oh, and, do you also take over maintainance of libexif10 > > or is that still an orphaned package? > > libexif10 should be moved to _obsolete, and being that it's also > affected by the buffer overflow, should be dropped like a hot potato. I moved libexif10 to _obsolete. Another question: The exif package was Gerrit's package, too, and it's still on version 0.6.9. Any chance that you could take this one over as well? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
