FWIW +1 If accepted, how long before it could be used to submit packages? (if at all?)
Tim. On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:49:18PM -0500, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > > I would like to propose my cygport package as a new package > > building/maintaining method, as well as a new package for the distribution. > > This still needs two more votes and a GTG. In the meantime, I've made > an update. New URLs: > > ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/cygwinports/release/cygport/cygport-0.1.93-1-src.tar.bz2 > ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/cygwinports/release/cygport/cygport-0.1.93-1.tar.bz2 > ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/cygwinports/release/cygport/setup.hint > > A number of fixes are included, as well as updated support for all > current modules in gst-plugins, a new cvs.cygclass for creating packages > from CVS snapshots, and a top-level patch/ directory for easier access > to the created patches. > > > Yaakov > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD4DBQFEY+mepiWmPGlmQSMRAj3HAKDOHwu9KeMmoVUR3AFH+eMTiMOHoACYjTk9 > xFRKzEG440URR3HQM4TRvA== > =xA7V > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Tim. "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results." -- Winston Churchill