On Apr 11 07:00, Brian Dessent wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > I can't tell how long it takes until we release 1.5.20, but in the > > meantime I'm wondering if we should just give up and revert to using > > fake inode numbers on Samba shares. I don't see any way to distinguish > > How about defaulting to on with an option in $CYGWIN to disable it so > that people accessing broken samba shares can get along?
I thought about this, too. This was originally coupled to the "smbntsec" setting but this is unfortunate because the inode problem has nothing to do with ntsec at all. But I would rather not add yet another option for this, if possible. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
