-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lapo Luchini wrote: > Category "Devel" is huge, really huge. > The main "reason" behind this (from my point of view, of course) is > that it contains both "tools" (compilers, versioning systems, and so > on) and "libraries" (the many many many lib*) useful for developers. > I propose to divide it, maybe, in something as straightforward as > "Devel-tools" and "Devel-libraries"? > > Another idea could be to have even smaller categories: > - compilers and intepreters (we would have well over 20 packages in > this category, AFAIR) > - versioning systems (we got 4 or 5 already, if I'm not wrong, would > be around 15 packages I think) > - libraries (I can't imagine any sub-category here, possibly X11 and > not-X11) > > Comments, ideas, suggestions?
I like the second scheme. Whilst we are doing it, we could also standardize what we mean by the "Libs" category - only packages actually providing DLLs? Or anything that is library-related in any way? Max. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFEJs8SfFNSmcDyxYARArb2AKDH8CYhiGOJ5rCNMWNtaMFm11wFAgCeLEp+ tlecEP+nkKjiAbsFkuEI6qo= =iyg5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
