On Nov 15 13:13, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:20:26PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > >On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >>I really don't like the need for underscores or dashes and I *really* > > >>don't like the upper case stuff. When I see all upper case on a screen > > >>I think there's something not set up right somewhere. > > > > > >Well, it'll have to be attention-grabbing. Barring color, ALL-CAPS is > > >the only way we can do this, right? The underscores you are probably > > >right about -- I was just trying to avoid the need to quote the > > >category name. BTW, the dash in this case is not a divider, but a > > >legitimate hyphen -- it'd be there even in the normal case. > > > > Aren't these already going to be sorted first, owing to the "."? Could we > > use '***' instead of '.', maybe? That would be attention grabbing. > > Hmm... Not sure, but we can try it and see. It's not like the category > name is set in stone -- it could always be changed later, until we find > something that people like.
Well, since I was the one suggesting the use of all-uppercase, it should be pretty clear that I still think it's the right thing to do. The text should indicate that it's something different, the category is not a normal category but a meta-category which should be the first place where the user looks when installing. All-uppercase in the current setup layout is the only useful style, IMHO. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.
