Max Bowsher schrieb: > I'd like some opinions... > Apache HTTPD 2.0 is a little schitzophrenic about what it should be > called: "httpd" or "apache2" - what do you think the Cygwin package > should be named?
There exists no httpd2, just httpd2-naat (Network Appliance Administration Tool on Mandrake). There exist: http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=apache2 httpd-2.0.x (fedora, asp linux, netwinder) apache2 (suse, mandrake, Falsehope) apache used just for apache1 only So I would say "apache2" or "httpd", preferring "apache2" because it's clearer and nearer. > To avoid conflict with the 1.3 package, I've appended a "2" to the names > of all the executables (and manpages). Horrible, but I can't see any > better way. Can you? --prefix=/opt/apache2 > At the moment my package is using the default pidfile of > /var/run/httpd.pid . Do I need to dig through the source (and manual) > and patch this to httpd2.pid, or can we safely assume no one will want > to run both at once? You usually do run both at once, for testing purposes. But it's easy for the user to change that in the conf file. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban http://phpwiki.org
