Robert Collins wrote: >Huh? Doing what I suggest has nothing to do with the # of connections, >the protocol supports it completely. It might, if you are spawning rsync >locally each time, with the file list option, you could (easily) add a >new file destination list, and that would provide the single connection, >custom basis approach. > > Huh? Do yo mean using the "new" batch mode, with --read-batch and --write-batch? I don't think I understand in which way you mean to accomplish it... Probably I have overlooked the "full" usefulness of some command line option...
-- Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
