On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> > (cd ${instdir} && \
> > find ${instdir} -name "*.exe" -o -name "*.dll" | xargs cygcheck | \
> > sed -e '/\.exe/d' -e 's,\\,/,g' | sort -bu | xargs -n1 cygpath -u \
> > - | xargs cygcheck -f | sed 's%^% %' ; \
> > + | xargs cygcheck -f | sed 's%^% %' | uniq ; \
> > true )
> > }
>
> Wouldn't the last "uniq" better be a "sort -u" instead?
> Files are sorted after the first "sed", that's true: but they get sorted
> by file name, while in the following passage we extract package name
> which contains those files: who assures us that the package list is
> already sorted?
> I guess this is true in "most of the cases" (where the package name is
> the same as the file name), or is there an "implied" sort that I didn't
> catch?
>
> Lapo
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. Technically, "cygcheck -f" *will*
sort the packages for all files specified on the command line, but just in
case xargs decides to split the file list across multiple command lines, a
"sort -u" would definitely be safer.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"Happiness lies in being privileged to work hard for long hours in doing
whatever you think is worth doing." -- Dr. Jubal Harshaw
