On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:11:02AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Since Chris doesn't seem to want to come right out and say it for everyone to understand, I'll say it:
Please don't profess to speak for me since you really have no idea what I'm saying or not saying.
I'm not speaking for you and did not claim to. I did just what you have been doing: left out a lot of words that clarify my intentions.
I am not considering that "we" should devise a way for setup.exe to work around these export considerations and I'll shoot down any attempts to do so.
Oh really? How you gonna shoot down somebody outside of the US hosting a few packages and distributing a version of setup.exe. Don't threaten to do what you cannot do.
I am going to contact our legal staff about gnupg.
Then why didn't you make it more apparent that you were doing so and that we could expect to hear more about this in the future?
But, please don't let that stop everyone from continuing this thread, speculating on what I'm thinking, or offering suggestions based on complete lack of legal experience.
Your rude comments are not necessary.
However, your comments also apply to yourself. You pulled a package that has been in the distribution for a long time with no legal council, so don't insult me by saying that I have no right to make basic decisions regarding legal matters.
Harold
